Paul Jubb vs Toby Martin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 12:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Jubb vs T. Martin

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jubb 2 - 0 Martin
They have played 4 sets in total, with Paul Jubb winning 4 and Toby Martin winning 0. The last match between Paul Jubb and Toby Martin was at the M25 Aldershot, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Jubb getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jubb | 2 |
| Martin | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Aldershot(08-13-25)
(R2) M25 Roehampton(08-07-25)
P. Jubb vs T. Martin H2H Profile
P. Jubb vs T. Martin Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance indicates Jubb leads by winning 46.2% of points compared to Martin's 44.85%. Given the correlation with match outcomes, could this be a deciding factor?
- In returning games, Martin has an edge with 48.54% of second serve return points over Jubb's 44.92%, alongside a narrow advantage in first serve returns (29.7% vs. 28.12%).
- Under pressure, Jubb excels in saving breakpoints at 56.06%, while Martin manages 47.1%. Does this skill under pressure favor Jubb?
- Over the past year, Jubb has a slight match win percentage advantage at 52.94% compared to Martin's 51.02%.
- On clay, Jubb is dominant with a 72% win rate, surpassing Martin's 53%. Grass is challenging for both, but Jubb also holds an edge.
- Jubb's experience in Challengers/ITF exceeds $10K events, despite winning only 34.48%, compared to Martin’s success rate of 52.08% in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF.
- Historically, Jubb has triumphed in their sole head-to-head meeting against Martin, winning 6-2, 6-3 on a hard surface.
- Previous encounters last approximately 1 hour and 4 minutes on average, with no match decision seeing beyond 2 sets.
- Against all players, Jubb outperforms in deciding sets with a 60% win rate compared to Martin’s 40%.
- Both players show similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Martin slightly ahead (33.33% vs. 32.74%).
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent trends, Jubb demonstrates stronger performance on key metrics such as second serve points and breakpoint saves. This poise under pressure can provide a crucial advantage in tense moments.
Jubb's adept handling of deciding sets, with a 60% success rate, indicates resilience in critical junctures, suggesting potential dominance if the match extends.
Their superior win rate on clay compared to Martin signifies potential performance disparities on certain surfaces, although this match is not specified for clay.
Despite Martin's slight supremacy in return metrics and experience at the lower-tier event level, Jubb's overall past head-to-head success tips the scales.
Considering these factors, Paul Jubb is the likely winner for the upcoming tennis match.
Paul Jubb vs Toby Martin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Jubb vs T. Martin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:21:7 | Average Match Time | 1:21:7 |
| 63% (60/95) | 1st Serve % | 59% (65/111) |
| 75% (45/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (38/65) |
| 49% (17/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 48% (53/111) | Return Points Win % | 35% (33/95) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Jubb Recent Matches Played
T. Martin Recent Matches Played

P. Jubb vs T. Martin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.49% (245/118) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.78% (349/325) |
| 64.18% (543/303) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.97% (790/730) |
| 55.06% (4453/3634) | Games Win/Loss | 51.36% (7377/6987) |
| 71.20% (136/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.71% (136/122) |
| 72.15% (57/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.70% (166/149) |
| 57.69% (30/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.28% (42/45) |
| 53.66% (22/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1145 | Aces Total | 898 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1084 | Total Double Faults | 955 |
| 1:37:6 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 405.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.36 |
| 62% (14816/23782) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13493/21604) |
| 70% (10311/14816) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8809/13493) |
| 52% (4700/8966) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3699/8110) |
| 42% (1091/2626) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (932/2174) |
| 41% (10204/24714) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8722/21470) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.80% (66/59) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 78.85% (164/44) | Futures W/L | 52.10% (348/320) |
| 68% (242/354) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (343/662) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 61% (72/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (81/172) |
| 56% (66/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (85/182) |
| 90% (238/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (358/309) |
| 10% (238/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (358/47) |
| 25% (125/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (316/39) |